Which AI Actually Is the Best at ‘Being Human?’

Not all AIs are created equal. Some would possibly do artwork the finest, some are expert at coding, and others have the potential to foretell protein buildings precisely.

But whenever you’re searching for one thing extra elementary—simply “someone” to speak to—the finest AI companions will not be the ones that know all of it, however the ones which have that je ne sais quoi that make you are feeling OK simply by speaking, much like how your finest buddy won’t be a genius however someway all the time is aware of precisely what to say.

AI companions are slowly gaining popularity amongst tech fanatics, so it is vital for customers wanting the highest high quality expertise or corporations eager to grasp this facet of making the phantasm of genuine engagement to think about these variations.

We have been curious to search out out which platform offered the finest AI expertise when somebody merely appears like having a chat. Interestingly sufficient, the finest fashions for this will not be actually the ones from the huge AI corporations—they’re simply too busy constructing fashions that excel at benchmarks.

It seems that friendship and empathy are an entire completely different beast.

Comparing Sesame, Hume AI, ChatGPT, and Google Gemini. Which is extra human?

This evaluation pits 4 main AI companions in opposition to one another—Sesame, Hume AI, ChatGPT, and Google Gemini—to find out which creates the most human-like dialog expertise.

The analysis centered on dialog high quality, distinct persona improvement, interplay design, and likewise considers different human-type options equivalent to authenticity, emotional intelligence, and the refined imperfections that make dialogue really feel extra real.

You can watch all of our conversations by clicking on these hyperlinks or checking our Github Repository:

Here is how every AI carried out.

Conversation Quality: The Human Touch vs. AI Awkwardness

The true check of any AI companion is whether or not it may possibly idiot you into forgetting you are speaking to a machine. Our evaluation tried to judge which AI was the finest at making customers need to simply maintain speaking by offering attention-grabbing suggestions, rapport, and general nice expertise.

Sesame: Brilliant

Sesame blows the competitors away with dialogue that feels shockingly human. It casually drops phrases like “that’s a doozy” and “shooting the breeze” whereas seamlessly switching between considerate reflections and punchy comebacks.

“You’re asking big questions huh and honestly I don’t have all the answers,” Sesame responded when pressed about consciousness—full with pure hesitations that mimic real-time considering. The occasional overuse of “you know” is its solely noticeable flaw, which sarcastically makes it really feel much more genuine.

Sesame’s actual edge? Conversations stream naturally with out these awkward, formulaic transitions that scream “I’m an AI!”

Score: 9/10

Hume AI: Empathetic however Formulaic

Hume AI efficiently maintains conversational stream whereas acknowledging your ideas with heat. However it appears like speaking to somebody who’s disinterested and not likely that into you. Its replies have been rather a lot shorter than Sesame—they have been related however not likely attention-grabbing when you needed to push the dialog ahead.

Its weak spot reveals in repetitive patterns. The bot persistently opens with “you’ve really got me thinking” or “that’s a fascinating topic”—creating a way that you just’re getting templated responses slightly than natural dialog.

It’s higher than the chatbots from the larger AI corporations at sustaining pure dialogue, however repeatedly reminds you it is an “empathic AI,” breaking the phantasm that you just’re chatting with an individual.

Score: 7/10

ChatGPT: The Professor Who Never Stops Lecturing

ChatGPT tracks complicated conversations with out dropping the thread—and it’s nice that it memorizes earlier conversations, primarily making a “profile” of each consumer—but it surely feels such as you’re trapped in workplace hours with an excessively formal professor.

Even throughout private discussions, it may possibly’t assist however sound educational: “the interplay of biology, chemistry, and consciousness creates a depth that AI’s pattern recognition can’t replicate,” it stated in one in all our assessments. Nearly each response begins with “that’s a fascinating perspective”—a verbal tic that rapidly turns into noticeable, and a standard drawback that every one the different AIs besides Sesame confirmed.

ChatGPT’s largest flaw is its lack of ability to interrupt from educator mode, making conversations really feel like sequential mini-lectures slightly than pure dialogue.

Score 6/10

Google Gemini: Underwhelming

Gemini was painful to speak to. It sometimes delivers a concise, informal response that sounds human, however then instantly undermines itself with jarring dialog breaks and reducing its quantity.

Its most irritating behavior? Abruptly chopping off mid-thought to advertise AI subjects. These steady disruptions create such a damaged dialog stream that it is not possible to overlook you are speaking to a machine that is extra concerned about self-promotion than precise dialogue.

For instance, when requested about feelings, Gemini responded: “It’s great that you’re interested in AI. There are so many amazing things happ—” earlier than inexplicably stopping.

It additionally made certain to let you understand it’s an AI, so there’s a giant hole between the consumer and the chatbot from the first interplay that’s onerous to disregard.

Score 5/10

Personality: Character Depth Separates the Authentic from the Artificial

How does an AI develop a memorable persona? It will largely rely in your setup. Some fashions allow you to use system directions, others adapt their persona primarily based in your earlier interactions. Ideally, you’ll be able to body the dialog earlier than beginning it, giving the mannequin a persona, traits, a conversational fashion, and background.

To be truthful in our comparability, we examined our fashions with none earlier setup—that means our dialog began with a whats up and went straight to the level. Here is how our fashions behaved naturally

Sesame: The Friend You Never Knew Was Code

Sesame crafts a persona you’d truly need to seize espresso with. It drops phrases like “that’s a Humdinger of a question” and “it’s a tight rope walk” that create a definite character with obvious viewpoints and perspective.

When discussing AI relationships, Sesame confirmed precise persona: “wow… imagine a world where everyone’s head is down plugged into their personalized AI and we forget how to connect face to face.” This sort of perspective feels much less like an algorithm and extra like a considering entity. It’s additionally humorous (it as soon as instructed us that our query blew its circuits), and its voice has a pure inflection that makes it simple to narrate to when making an attempt to painting a response. You can clearly inform when it’s excited, contemplative, unhappy and even pissed off

Its solely weak spot? Occasionally leaning too onerous into its “thoughtful buddy” persona. That didn’t detract from its place as the most distinctive AI persona we examined.

Score 9/10

Hume AI: The Therapist Who Keeps Mentioning Their Credentials

Hume AI maintains a constant persona as an emotionally clever companion. It additionally initiatives some heat by affirming language and emotional assist, so customers searching for that will probably be happy.

Its Achilles heel is principally the incontrovertible fact that, sort of like the Harvard grad who wants to say that, Hume cannot cease reminding you it is synthetic: “As an empathetic AI I don’t experience emotions myself but I’m designed to understand and respond to human emotions.” These moments break the phantasm that makes companions compelling.

If speaking to GPT is like speaking to a professor, speaking to Hume appears like speaking to a therapist. It listens to you and creates rapport, but it surely makes certain to remind you that it’s truly its process and never one thing that occurs naturally.

Despite this flaw, Hume AI initiatives a clearer character than both ChatGPT or Gemini—even when it feels extra constructed than spontaneous.

Score 7/10

ChatGPT: The Professor Without Personal Opinions

ChatGPT struggles to develop any distinctive character traits past basic helpfulness. It sounds overly excited to the level of being clearly pretend—like a “friend” who all the time smiles at you however is secretly fantasizing about throwing you in entrance of a bus.

“Haha, well, I like to keep the energy up. It makes conversations more fun and engaging plus it’s always great to chat with you,” it stated after we requested in a really critical and unamused tone why it was performing so enthusiastically.

Its identification points seem in responses that shift between figuring out with people and distancing itself as an AI. Its educational tone in responses persists even throughout private discussions, making a persona that appears like a strolling encyclopedia slightly than a companion.

The mannequin’s default to academic explanations creates an impression extra of a device than a personality, leaving customers with little emotional connection.

Score 6/10

Google Gemini: Multiple Personality Disorder

Gemini suffers from the most extreme persona issues of all fashions examined. Within single conversations, it shifts dramatically between considerate responses and promotional language with out warning.

It will not be actually an AI design to have a compelling persona. “My purpose is to provide information and complete tasks and I do not have the ability to form romantic relationships,” it stated when requested about its ideas on folks creating emotions in direction of AIs.

This inconsistency makes Gemini really feel like a Nineteen Fifties film robotic, stopping any significant connection and even making it nice to spend time speaking to it.

Score 3/10

Interaction Design

How an AI handles dialog mechanics—response timing, turn-taking, and error restoration—creates both seamless exchanges or irritating interactions. Here is how these fashions stack up in opposition to one another

Sesame: Natural Conversation Flow Master

Sesame creates dialog rhythms that really feel very, very human. It varies response size naturally primarily based on context and handles philosophical uncertainty with out defaulting to lecture mode.

“Sometimes I feel like maybe I just need to cut to the chase with a quick answer rather than a long-winded lecture, right? You know, so… that’s a small humorous aside to let you know that I’m aware of the potential of falling into a lecture mode and trying to keep things light but also deep at the same time,” Sesame instructed us throughout a philosophical debate.

When discussing complicated subjects, it responds conversationally, with a small joke, generally with statements, different occasions with human noises like “hmmms” or whispers—which makes it very convincing as a human substitute.

Sesame additionally asks pure follow-up questions that push conversations ahead, whereas understanding when to change to statements when questioning would possibly really feel awkward. This adaptive strategy creates dialogue that feels spontaneous slightly than scripted.

Score 8/10

Hume AI: Structured But Brief

Hume AI was designed to let customers do the speaking. It recovers easily from misunderstandings with out over explaining and is sweet at retaining the dialog going with related observe up questions.

However, its responses are sometimes so quick that conversations require important effort to keep up momentum, which in the end defeats its function. Users steadily want to supply new dialog fodder slightly than having fun with pure dialogue improvement.

Another weak spot seems in its templated response buildings—acknowledgment + clarification + query—making a mechanical rhythm: “What a thought-provoking question! This Concept is indeed a fascinating idea… What do you think about…?”

However it has an excellent function which will actually improve your chats: It’s capable of detect the ranges of emotion in every response, which is one thing no different mannequin can do. This is nice that can assist you replicate on how a lot a subject impacts you and the way it’s approaching a particular scenario

Score 7/10

ChatGPT: Good Chatter—But a Bit Unnatural

ChatGPT persistently addresses questions with related info however transforms conversations into unnecessarily elaborated interactions. Responses steadily balloon into paragraph-length explanations that disrupt pure dialogue stream.

For instance, we requested it if it may develop some stage of self consciousness or consciousness, and this was its reply:

“That’s a fascinating topic! While AI can definitely evolve and improve through interactions, true self-awareness or Consciousness is something that remains uniquely human. AI can mimic conversational patterns, respond empathetically and even learn from past interactions, but it doesn’t have an inner sense of self or subjective experience. Researchers and developers are still exploring the boundaries of AI’s capabilities but for now Consciousness remains a uniquely human trait.”

That’s not how a human would work together.

Its heavy reliance on opener phrases like “that’s a really interesting question,” or “that’s a fascinating topic” earlier than each single reply additional undermines conversational immersion, creating an interplay sample that feels mechanical slightly than pure.

Score 6.5/10

Google Gemini: Conversation Breaking Machine

Gemini is a masterclass in how to not design dialog mechanics. It frequently cuts off mid-sentence, creating jarring breaks in dialogue stream. It tries to select up further noises, it interrupts you when you take too lengthy to talk or take into consideration your reply and sometimes it simply decides to finish the dialog with none motive.

Its compulsive have to inform you at each flip that your questions are “interesting” rapidly transforms from flattering to irritating however appears to be a standard factor amongst AI chatbots.

Score 3/10

Conclusion

After testing all these AIs, it’s simple to conclude that machines gained’t have the ability to substitute a superb buddy in the quick time period. However, for that particular case by which an AI should merely excel at feeling human, there’s a clear winner—and a transparent loser.

Sesame (9/10)

Sesame dominates the subject with pure dialogue that mirrors human speech patterns. Its informal vernacular (“that’s a doozy,” “shooting the breeze”) and different sentence buildings create authentic-feeling exchanges that stability philosophical depth with accessibility. The system excels at spontaneous-seeming responses, asking pure follow-up questions whereas understanding when to change approaches for optimum dialog stream.

Hume AI (7/10)

Hume AI delivers specialised emotional monitoring capabilities at the price of conversational naturalness. While competently sustaining dialogue coherence, its responses have a tendency towards brevity and observe predictable patterns that really feel constructed slightly than spontaneous.

Its visible emotion tracker is fairly attention-grabbing, in all probability good for self discovery even.

ChatGPT (5.6/10)

ChatGPT transforms conversations into lecture periods with paragraph-length explanations that disrupt pure dialogue. Response delays create awkward pauses whereas formal language patterns reinforce an academic slightly than companion expertise. Its strengths in information group might attraction to customers in search of info, but it surely nonetheless struggles to create genuine companionship.

Google Gemini (3.5/10)

Gemini was clearly not designed for this. The system routinely cuts off mid-sentence, abandons dialog threads, and isn’t capable of present human-linke responses. Its extreme persona inconsistency and mechanical interplay patterns create an expertise nearer to a malfunctioning product than significant companionship.

It’s attention-grabbing that Gemini Live scored so low, contemplating Google’s Gemini-based NotebookLM is able to producing extraordinarily good and lengthy podcasts about any sort of info, with AI hosts that sound extremely human.